Influence of urinary tract infections on the incidence of surgical site infections following hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prevalence of surgical site infections (SSIs) following hip fracture surgery poses a substantial challenge, compounding patient morbidity and healthcare costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the potential correlation between perioperative urinary tract infections (UTIs) and the subsequent risk of SSIs, aiming to illuminate the impact of UTIs on postoperative outcomes in this vulnerable population. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilising the PICO framework to define our search strategy across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Our inclusion criteria encompassed randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies that reported on SSIs following hip fracture surgery in patients with UTIs. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic. A random-effects model was applied due to significant heterogeneity, and a sensitivity analysis assessed the stability of the results. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, demonstrating high methodological quality. The analysis included studies from 2016 to 2021, with sample sizes ranging from 402 to 31 621 participants. A significant association was found between UTIs and SSIs, with an odds ratio of 2.79 (95% CI: 1.72-4.54, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results, and no publication bias was detected. Perioperative UTIs significantly increase the risk of SSIs in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Proactive treatment of UTIs may be crucial for reducing the incidence of SSIs and improving surgical outcomes in this demographic.

Comparative effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group block versus fascia iliac compartment block on postoperative wound pain management in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hip fracture surgeries are challenging, with postoperative pain management being a critical component of patient care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) and fascia iliac compartment block (FICB) in postoperative wound pain management for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was structured around the PICO framework. Comprehensive searches were conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were limited to RCTs comparing the effectiveness of PENGB and FICB in adult patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Key outcomes included pain control effectiveness, safety, and complication incidence. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics, and meta-analysis effect values were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effect models, depending on the degree of heterogeneity. The search identified 1095 articles, with 5 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that PENGB and FICB were comparable in managing postoperative pain and opioid consumption. However, PENGB significantly reduced the incidence of quadriceps muscle weakness (RR = 0.12, p < 0.05) and did not increase the risk of PONV (RR = 1.36, p = 0.51), suggesting its advantage in maintaining motor function without adding to PONV complications. No significant publication bias was detected. PENGB is comparable to FICB in pain and opioid consumption management after hip fracture surgeries. Its significant benefit lies in reducing the incidence of quadriceps muscle weakness, facilitating better postoperative mobility. Additionally, PENGB does not increase the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, underlining its suitability for comprehensive postoperative care in hip fracture patients.

A novel hybrid fixation (coracoclavicular screw supplemented with K-wire) for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of clavicular hook plate fixation and the coracoclavicular lag screw supplemented with K-wire fixation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: Between January 2012 to December 2015, 81 patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation were included in this prospective study. 43 patients were treated with clavicular hook plate fixation (Group A) and 38 patients were treated with coracoclavicular lag screw supplemented with K-wire fixation (Group B). Incision length, operation duration, blood loss volume, intraoperative fluoroscopy times and length of hospitalization were recorded. Radiographic outcomes, functional outcomes and complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Both two groups could achieve good radiographic and functional outcomes after operation. Group B exhibited significantly shorter operation duration, shorter length of incision, less blood loss volume and shorter length of hospitalization than Group A (P < 0.001). In addition, significant difference could be found between the two groups regarding the VAS scores three month postoperatively and the final follow-up (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in radiographic and functional outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The two groups can both achieve satisfactory radiological and functional outcomes in treating acute AC joint dislocation. However, CC screw fixation supplemented with K-wire exerts some advantages regarding the incision length, operation duration, blood loss volume, length of hospitalization. Furthermore, it can better relieve the pain caused by dislocation. Therefore, the novel hybrid fixation (CC screw fixation supplemented with K-wire) provides an alternative treatment for acute AC joint dislocation.

[The causes and preventive methods of misdiagnosis on wrist scaphoid bone fracture].

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analysis the curative effect of wrist scaphoid bone fracture,and explore the causes and preventive methods of misdiagnosis. METHODS: From September 2007 to September 2010,16 patients with wrist scaphoid bone fractures were treated with plaster cast and cannulated screws fixation. There were 10 males and 6 females,ranging in age from 26 to 44 years with an average of 35 years. Among them, 12 cases manifested swelling pain of radial lateral wrist, tenderness at snuffbox area, wrist pain aggravated when stretching wrist joint, thumb or forefinger; 4 cases manifested no obviously symptoms and limited movement; 9 cases were early diagnosed; 5 cases were treated by plaster cast; 4 cases were treated with cannulated screws fixation; Among 7 cases with misdiagnosis, there were 4 cases without obvious symptoms and they were dealt with activating blood to dissipate swelling and pain process in preliminary stage. Four cases were treated with plaster cast and 3 cases with cannulated screws fixation. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up from 3 months to 39 months (averaged 21 months). Among 16 patients, 9 cases were early diagnosis, 7 cases were misdiagnosis and the rate of misdiagnosis was 43.8%. Seven cases with screws fixation were no wound infection. There was 1 case with occurred chronic pain and declining wrist mobility in both plaster cast and screw group, and both of them were misdiagnosed. According to curative effect rating criteria,these 2 cases were classified into moderate, other 14 cases were excellent. CONCLUSION: Wrist scaphoid bone fracture are easy to misdiagnose, so early diagnosis and treatment is particularly important. The main causes of misdiagnosis are nonspecific symptoms at early stage, combination with other injuries, lack of knowledge and ignorance of the further examination. Therefore, detailed inquiries and particular examination, multi-dimensional radiography and CT scan or MRI scan are the main measures for prevention.

[Application of endobutton in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical efficacy of the endobutton in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by reconstructing coracoclavicular ligaments. METHODS: From October 2008 to January 2010,12 patients with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation were immobilized with the endobutton. All the patients had the dislocations of or above type III according to Rockwood classification. Among the patients, 9 patients were male and 3 patients were female, with an average age of 55 years (ranged from 31 to 83 years). Eight patients had injuries in the left, and 4 patients in the right. Four patients had accompanied injuries of rib fractures, 2 patients had brain injuries,and 1 patient had femoral fracture. Seven patients were injured by traffic accident, 4 patients were injured by falling down,and 1 patient was sports injuries. All the patients had pain and tenderness at the shoulder, positive piano sign, and shoulder confined activity. The duration from injury to operation ranged from 2 days to 10 days (averaged 6 days). The therapeutic effects were evaluated by Karlsson criteria based on range of motion of acromioclavicular joint, subjective feeling,and postoperative X-ray. RESULTS: All the patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 4 months to 19 months (averaged 11 months). The motion of the shoulder joint recovered to normal about 15 to 35 days after operation. There were no displacement, dislocation and redislocation occurred. All the patients got A degree results according to Karlsson criteria. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by using the endobutton to treat acute acromioclavicular dislocation of or above type III is a perfect method with advantage of rigid fixation, micro-injury, and early functional exercise.